Recap

Dr. Teddy emphasized the need to establish a credible platform that could be used to disseminate research outputs. She observed that the current focus of the journal initiative is based on the Ghana Health Service. She, however, pointed out that there might be some benefits in considering the scope of the initiative. She explained that the initiative might potentially be developed into a “Ghana Health Service Journal.” She added that this would allow the initiative to attract high-quality research papers not only from Ghana but from the rest of the world focusing on Ghana Health Issues.

Additionally, she advised that the editorial structure of the journal should be enhanced to include thematic editorial areas. This would enable the manuscripts to be efficiently allocated to the editor with the relevant expertise in the relevant thematic area. She also stressed the need to expand the pool of the reviewers and utilize the network of professionals who had previously been trained or worked with the research centers. Involving this group as associate reviewers or junior editorial members may assist in improving the review process while at the same time promoting professional collaboration.

Dr. Teddy also encouraged the research centers to take advantage of their existing associations with academic institutions and researchers. While academic reviewing may not be a lucrative activity, she stressed that it is an important activity that should be encouraged as it enhances the research community.

Before leaving due to other commitments, she expressed her appreciation for the opportunity to participate in the discussions. She commended the team on the productive and participatory nature of the discussions that were conducted with the aim of improving the research governance structure. She wished the team success with their endeavors.